越婢加半夏汤加减联合西医综合疗法治疗支气管哮喘热哮证临床研究
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R562.25

基金项目:


Clinical Study on Modified Yuebi and Banxia Decoction Combined with Comprehen⁃ sive Western Medicine Therapy for Bronchial Asthma with Heat-Wheezing Syndrome
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察越婢加半夏汤加减联合西医综合疗法治疗支气管哮喘热哮证的临床疗效。方法:选取 200 例哮喘患者,按随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组各100 例。对照组给予西医综合治疗,观察组在对照组 基础上给予越婢加半夏汤加减治疗,2 组均治疗2 个月。评价2 组临床疗效,比较2 组治疗前后中医证候评 分、肺功能、呼吸道疾病问卷修订版(AQ20-R) 评分、哮喘控制问卷(ACQ-5) 评分、气道高反应性、细胞 间黏附分子-1 (ICAM-1) 及嗜酸性粒细胞(EOS) 水平,并评价药物安全性。结果:观察组总有效率为 97.00%,高于对照组87.00%(P<0.05)。治疗后,2 组各项中医证候评分较治疗前降低(P<0.05),且观察组 各项中医证候评分低于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,2 组第1 秒用力呼气容积占预计值百分比(FEV1%)、第 1 秒用力呼气容积与用力肺活量的比值(FEV1/FVC) 较治疗前升高,AQ20-R 评分、ACQ-5 评分均较治疗前降 低(P<0.05);且观察组FEV1%、FEV1/FVC 高于对照组,AQ20-R 评分、ACQ-5 评分低于对照组(P< 0.05)。治疗后,2 组FEV1 下降20%所需的最低累积剂量(PD20-FEV1) 高于治疗前,支气管舒张试验FEV1 增 加、支气管舒张试验FEV1 绝对值增加、呼气峰流速昼夜变异率(PEFR) 低于治疗前(P<0.05);观察组 PD20-FEV1 高于对照组,支气管舒张试验FEV1 增加、支气管舒张试验FEV1 绝对值增加、PEFR 低于对照 组(P<0.05)。治疗后,2 组ICAM-1、EOS 均低于治疗前(P<0.05),且观察组ICAM-1、EOS 低于对照 组(P<0.05)。2 组不良反应发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:越婢加半夏汤加减联合西医 综合疗法治疗支气管哮喘热哮证临床疗效确切,能改善气道高反应性,抑制气道慢性炎症反应,提高肺功能, 增强疗效,安全可靠。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:Objective:To observe the clinical effect of modified Yuebi and Banxia Decoction combined with comprehensive western medicine therapy on bronchial asthma with heat- wheezing syndrome. Methods:A total of 200 patients with asthma were selected and divided into the observation group and the control group according to the random number table method, with 100 cases in each group. The control group was given comprehensive western medicine therapy, and the observation group was additionally treated with modified Yuebi and Banxia Decoction based on the treatment of the control group. The two groups were treated for 2 months. The clinical effects in both groups were evaluated; the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndrome scores, lung function, scores of Airways Questionnaire 20- rised (AQ20R) and Asthma Control Questionnaire- 5 (ACQ- 5), airway hyperresponsiveness, and levels of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) and eosinophils (EOS) were compared between the two groups and the drug safety was also evaluated. Results: The total effective rate was 97.00% in the observation group, higher than that of 87.00% in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, all TCM syndrome scores in both groups were decreased when compared with those before treatment, and all TCM syndrome scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment,the forced expiratory volume in one second as a percentage of expected value (FEV1%),and ratio of forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) in the two groups were increased when compared with those before treatment, and the scores of AQ20- R and ACQ- 5 were decreased when compared with those before treatment (P<0.05); the FEV1% and FEV1/FVC in the observation group were higher than those in the control group, and the scores of AQ20- R and ACQ- 5 were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the minimum cumulative dose required for a 20% decrease in FEV1 (PD20- FEV1) in both groups was higher than that before treatment, and the increases in FEV1 and FEV1 of absolute value in bronchial dilation test and the peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05); the PD20- FEV1 in the observation group was higher than that in the control group,and the increases in FEV1 and FEV1 of absolute value in bronchial dilation test and the PEFR were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment,the levels of ICAM-1 and EOS in both groups were lower than those before treatment (P<0.05),and the above two levels in the observation group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). There was no significant difference being found in the comparison of incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups (P>0.05). Conclusion: Modified Yuebi and Banxia Decoction combined with comprehensive western medicine therapy has a definite clinical effect on bronchial asthma with heat-wheezing syndrome, which can improve the airway hyperresponsiveness,inhibit the chronic inflammatory responses of airway, and enhance the lung function and curative effect with good safety.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘中友,郑晓娜.越婢加半夏汤加减联合西医综合疗法治疗支气管哮喘热哮证临床研究[J].新中医,2023,55(9):53-58

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-05-24
  • 出版日期: