网状Meta分析6种常见针灸疗法治疗原发性痛经的疗效与安全性
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R246.3;R271.11 + 3

基金项目:


Network Meta-analysis on Curative Effect and Safety of Six Common Acupuncture and Moxibustion Therapies on Primary Dysmenorrhe
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:基于贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析评价 6 种针灸疗法治疗原发性痛经(PD)的临床疗效与安全 性。方法:计算机检索 PubMed、Web of science 等数据库,搜集 6 种常见针灸疗法(针刺、针灸、艾灸、温针 灸、电针及穴位埋线)治疗 PD 的随机对照试验研究文献,检索时限为 2000 年 1 月 1 日—2020 年 9 月 30 日。 由 2 位研究者独立筛选文献、提取数据和评价纳入研究的偏倚风险。采用 R 软件进行数据分析,以 Stata16.0 软件绘制网状证据图。结果:共纳入 98 项随机对照试验研究,总计 7 410 例 PD 患者,涉及 8 种干预措施。所 有结局指标均显示随机效应模型整体拟合度较好,可以在一致性模型下进行网状 Meta 分析。在有效率方面, 针刺、艾灸、针灸、温针灸、电针、穴位埋线均优于空白或安慰剂、非甾体类抗炎药,针灸、温针灸均优于针 刺及艾灸,有效率排序第一为温针灸。在疼痛缓解方面,针灸的效果优于针刺及艾灸,除艾灸与电针外,其余 干预措施缓解疼痛的效果均优于非甾体类抗炎药,缓解疼痛效果排序第一为针灸。在安全性方面,各干预措施 之间比较,差异无统计学意义,均表现出良好的安全性。结论:6 种针灸疗法治疗 PD 的临床疗效均优于非甾 体类抗炎药,针灸与温针灸可成为临床治疗 PD 的首选疗法。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the clinical effect of 6 acupuncture and moxibustion therapies on primary dysmenorrhea (PD) and their safety based on Bayesian Meta-analysis. Methods:Using computers to search databases, including PubMed and Web of science, the research literature on randomized controlledtrialsofsixcommonacupuncturetherapies(needling,acupunctureandmoxibustion,moxibustion, warming-needle moxibustion,electroacupuncture and acupoint catgut embedment) for PD were collected from 1 st January,2000 to 30 th September,2020. Two investigators independently screened the literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. R software was used for data analysis and the network chart was made with Stata 16.0 software. Results:A total of 98 studies on randomized controlled trial involving 7 410 patients with PD and 8 intervention measures. All outcome indicators suggested that the overall goodness-of-fit of random effect model was good and network Meta-analysis can be done under the consistency model. In terms of effective rate, single needling, moxibustion, acupuncture and moxibustion, warming- needle moxibustion, electroacupuncture and acupoint catgut embedment were better than blank control or placebo and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs,and acupuncture and moxibustion, and warming- needle moxibustion were better than single needling and single moxibustion,with warming-needle moxibustion coming first. As for pain relief,acupuncture was superior to single acupuncture and single moxibustion, and all intervention measures except for moxibustion and electroacupuncture were better than non- steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs, with acupuncture ranking first. There was no significant difference being found in the comparison of safety between the intervention measures,and they all showed good safety. Conclusion:The clinical effects of the six acupuncture and moxibustion therapies for PD are superior to those of non- steroidal anti- inflammatory drugs,acupuncture and moxibustion,and warming-needle moxibustion can often be the therapies of choice for PD.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

龚小珍,黄颜怡,何广莲,陈思依,马晴,谢阳春.网状Meta分析6种常见针灸疗法治疗原发性痛经的疗效与安全性[J].新中医,2023,55(14):133-140

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-07-24
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码