电针治疗卒中后失眠Meta 分析与试验序贯分析
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R246;R256.23

基金项目:

汕头市医疗卫生科技计划(220519236491761);广东省中医药局科研项目(20242081)


Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis of Electroacupuncture Treatment for Post-Stroke Insomnia
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:系统评价电针治疗卒中后失眠的临床疗效。方法:检索中国知网(CNKI)、万方数据知识 服务平台(万方数据)、中文科技期刊数据库(VIP)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library等数据库中以电针为主要治疗措施治疗卒中后失眠的随机对照试验(RCTs) 文献,检索时限为建库至2023年10月31日。对纳入文献进行数据提取,采用Cochrane RoB 2.0风险偏倚评价 工具对纳入研究进行评价,Review Manager 5.4.1软件进行Meta分析,TSA 0.9.5.10 Beta软件进行试验序贯分析。 结果:共纳入8项研究,涉及516例患者。Meta分析结果显示,在总有效率方面,电针联合传统针刺优于传统 针刺[RR=1.14, 95%CI (1.03, 1.27), Z=2.41, P=0.02], 电针与药物比较差异无统计学意义[RR=1.11, 95%CI (0.92,1.33),Z=1.10,P=0.27],电针联合药物优于药物[RR=1.21,95%CI (1.02,1.43),Z=2.21,P= 0.03]。在降低匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI) 总分方面, 电针联合传统针刺优于传统针刺[MD=-1.61, 95%CI (-2.21,-1.01),Z=5.22,P<0.001],电针与药物比较差异无统计学意义[MD=-3.01,95%CI (-6.61, 0.59),Z=1.64,P=0.10],电针联合药物优于药物[MD=-1.65,95%CI (-2.02,-1.28),Z=8.85,P<0.001]。在 改善神经功能缺损方面,电针联合传统针刺优于传统针刺[MD=-1.65,95%CI (-2.18,-1.12),Z=6.10,P< 0.001]。在改善抑郁程度方面,电针联合传统针刺优于传统针刺[MD=-1.42,95%CI (-2.23,-0.61),Z=3.44, P<0.001]。经敏感性分析验证,本研究关于总有效率的Meta分析结果稳定。试验序贯分析结果显示,在总有 效率方面,电针联合传统针刺优于传统针刺的分析结果较为稳健,结论可排除假阳性;电针与药物比较无明显 差异的分析结果需要纳入更多试验来验证;电针联合药物优于药物的分析结果需要纳入更多试验以排除假阳性 结论。结论:在治疗卒中后失眠疗效方面,电针联合传统针刺优于传统针刺,电针联合药物优于药物。结论有 待更多高质量的RCTs支持。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective: To systematically evaluate the clinical effect of electroacupuncture in the treatment of post-stroke insomnia. Methods: The literature on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using electroacupuncture as the main treatment for post-stroke insomnia was searched in databases such as the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wangfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (Wanfang Data),Chinese Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP),China Biology Medicine (CBM),PubMed, Web of Science,Embase,and Cochrane Library,with a search deadline of October 31,2023. Data were extracted from the included literature and the included studies were evaluated by the Cochrane RoB 2.0 risk bias assessment tool; Meta-analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.4.1 software, and trial sequential analysis was performed by TSA 0.9.5.10 Beta software. Results: A total of eight studies were included, involving 516 patients. The Meta-analysis results showed that in terms of total effective rate, electroacupuncture combined with traditional acupuncture was superior to traditional acupuncture [RR= 1.14, 95%CI (1.03, 1.27), Z =2.41, P=0.02], and there was no significant difference between electroacupuncture and medication [RR=1.11,95%CI (0.92,1.33),Z =1.10,P=0.27],electroacupuncture combined with medication was superior to medication [RR=1.21,95%CI (1.02,1.43),Z =2.21,P=0.03]. In terms of reducing the total score of Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI),electroacupuncture combined with traditional acupuncture was superior to traditional acupuncture [MD=-1.61, 95%CI (-2.21, -1.01), Z =5.22, P<0.001],and there was no significant difference between electroacupuncture and medication [MD=-3.01, 95%CI (-6.61, 0.59),Z =1.64, P=0.10], electroacupuncture combined with medication was superior to medication [MD=-1.65, 95%CI (-2.02, -1.28),Z =8.85, P<0.001]. As for improving neurological deficits,electroacupuncture combined with traditional acupuncture was superior to traditional acupuncture [MD=-1.65,95%CI (-2.18,-1.12),Z =6.10,P<0.001]. In terms of improving depression, electroacupuncture combined with traditional acupuncture was superior to traditional acupuncture [MD= -1.42, 95%CI (-2.23, -0.61),Z =3.44, P<0.001]. After sensitivity analysis verification, the Metaanalysis results of the total effective rate in this study were stable. The trial sequential analysis results showed that in terms of total effective rate, the analysis results of electroacupuncture combined with traditional acupuncture superior to traditional acupuncture were robust, and the conclusion could exclude false positives. The analysis results of no significant difference between electroacupuncture and medication need to be included in more trials to verify. The analysis results of electroacupuncture combined with medication superior to medication need to be included in more trials to exclude false positives. Conclusion: In terms of the curative effect on post-stroke insomnia, the combination of electroacupuncture and traditional acupuncture is superior to traditional acupuncture, and electroacupuncture combined with medication is superior to medication. The conclusion requires more high-quality RCTs to support.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈泽权,陈树森,江焕钊,陈欣泽,林卓鹏.电针治疗卒中后失眠Meta 分析与试验序贯分析[J].新中医,2024,56(16):81-88

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-08-28
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码