不同血液透析方式治疗老年终末期肾病临床研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R459.5

基金项目:

河南省医学科技攻关计划联合共建项目(LHGJ20210280)


Clinical Study on Different Hemodialysis Modalities in the Treatment of Elderly End- Stage Renal Disease
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察不同血液透析方式治疗老年终末期肾病(ESRD) 的临床疗效。方法:选择2022年3月— 2023 年6 月在驻马店市中心医院门诊进行血液透析的50 例ESRD 患者,经4 周洗脱期之后依次进行血液透 析(HD)、高通量血液透析(HFHD) 及血液透析滤过(HDF) 各1次,HFHD、HDF、HD各间隔2周。于透 析前后,比较3种透析方式的小分子毒素[血清肌酐(SCr)、尿素氮(BUN)、血磷(P)] 水平、中大分子毒 素[β2-微球蛋白(β2-MG)、白蛋白(Alb)、C-反应蛋白(CRP)]水平。结果:3种透析方式透析前的SCr、 BUN、P、β2-MG、Alb、CRP水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。透析后,3种透方式的SCr、BUN、 P、β2-MG水平均较治疗前降低(P<0.05),HD、HDF的SCr水平均低于HFHD,HDF的BUN水平均低于HD、 HFHD(P<0.05)。3种透析方式的P水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。3种透析方式的Alb水平均 较透析前升高(P<0.05);HD 的Alb 水平均低于HFHD、HDF,β2-MG 水平均高于HFHD、HDF,HDF 的 β2-MG水平低于HFHD,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);3种透析方式的CRP水平与透析前比较,3种透析 方式的CRP水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:3 种血液透析方式治疗老年ESRD均能有效 清除小分子毒素,HFHD 清除β2-MG的效果优于HD,HDF清除β2-MG的效果优于HFHD,且可更明显改善 营养状态。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of different hemodialysis modalities in the treatment of elderly patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Methods:A total of 50 ESRD patients undergoing hemodialysis at the outpatient department of Zhumadian Central Hospital from March 2022 to June 2023 were selected. After a four-week washout period, the patients sequentially underwent conventional hemodialysis (HD), high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD), and hemodiafiltration (HDF) once each, with a two-week interval between each modality. Levels of small molecule toxins [serum creatinine (SCr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and serum phosphorus (P)], middle and large molecule toxins [β2-microglobulin ( β2-MG)],albumin( Alb),and C-reactive protein( CRP)] were compared before and after each dialysis session. Results:Before dialysis,there were no significant differences in the levels of SCr,BUN,P,β2-MG,Alb,and CRP among the three dialysis modalities( P>0.05). After dialysis,SCr, BUN,P,and β2-MG levels were significantly reduced compared with those before dialysis (P<0.05). The SCr levels were lower in HD and HDF compared to those in HFHD,and BUN levels were lower in HDF compared to those in HD and HFHD (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in P levels among the three dialysis modalities (P>0.05). The Alb levels were increased significantly after all three dialysis modalities (P<0.05). The HD resulted in lower Alb levels compared to HFHD and HDF,and higher β2-MG levels compared to HFHD and HDF;HDF had lower β2-MG levels compared to HFHD, with all differences being significant (P<0.05). There were no significant differences in CRP levels before and after dialysis or among the three dialysis modalities (P>0.05). Conclusion: All three hemodialysis modalities can effectively remove small molecule toxins in treating elderly ESRD. HFHD is superior to HD in removing β2-MG,while HDF has the best clearance effect and can more significantly improve nutritional status.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李敏,王东海,曹璐.不同血液透析方式治疗老年终末期肾病临床研究[J].新中医,2025,57(11):80-83

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-06-13
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码