中药穴位贴敷联合中药热罨包预防老年肿瘤化疗后不良反应临床研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R473.6

基金项目:


Clinical Study on Prevention of Adverse Reactions After Chemotherapy in Elderly Tumor Patients Using Chinese Medicine Point Application Combined with Chinese Medicine Hot Compress
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察中药穴位贴敷联合中药热罨包预防老年肿瘤化疗后不良反应的临床疗效。方法:选取 2023年5月—2024年5月在宁波市北仑区人民医院就诊的102例老年肿瘤化疗患者,根据化疗后干预方式分为 对照组53例和联合组49例。对照组予以中药热罨包干预,联合组在对照组基础上予以中药穴位贴敷干预。 2组均干预至化疗后第3天。比较2组不良反应发生率及严重程度,比较2组干预前后疼痛程度、心理状态、生 存质量评分,后续化疗接受度。结果:化疗后第3天,联合组静脉炎、腹水、恶心/呕吐发生率均低于对照 组(P<0.05),联合组不良反应严重程度轻于对照组(P<0.05)。化疗后6 h、24 h、第2天,联合组疼痛视觉 模拟评分法(VAS)评分均低于同期对照组(P<0.05);化疗后第3天,2组疼痛VAS评分比较,差异无统计学 意义(P>0.05)。化疗后第3天,2组焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分均较化疗前降低(P< 0.05),联合组SAS、SDS评分均低于对照组(P<0.05)。2组卡氏功能状态(KPS)评分均较化疗前升高(P< 0.05), 联合组KPS 评分高于对照组(P<0.05)。联合组后续化疗接受率87.76% (43/49), 高于对照组 71.70%(38/53)(P<0.05)。结论:中药穴位贴敷联合中药热罨包干预老年肿瘤化疗后不良反应的效果优于仅 单用中药热罨包,可缓解疼痛,改善负性心态,提高生活质量。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine point application combined with Chinese medicine hot compress in preventing adverse reactions after chemotherapy in elderly tumor patients. Methods: A total of 102 elderly tumor patients undergoing chemotherapy who were treated at Ningbo Beilun District People's Hospital from May 2023 to May 2024 were selected. Based on the post-chemotherapy intervention methods, they were divided into the control group (53 cases) and the combination group (49 cases). The control group received Chinese medicine hot compress intervention,while the combination group received Chinese medicine point application intervention based on the treatment in the control group. Both groups were intervened until the third day after chemotherapy. The incidence and severity of adverse reactions, pain levels, psychological states, quality-of-life scores,and subsequent chemotherapy acceptance rates were compared between the two groups. Results:On the third day after chemotherapy,the incidence rates of phlebitis,ascites,and nausea/vomiting in the combination group were all lower than those in the control group (P<0.05),and the severity of adverse reactions in the combination group was milder than that in the control group (P<0.05). At 6 hours,24 hours,and on the second day after chemotherapy,the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for pain in the combination group were all lower than those in the control group at the corresponding time points (P<0.05). On the third day after chemotherapy,there was no significant difference in pain VAS scores between the two groups (P>0.05). On the third day after chemotherapy, the Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) and Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS) scores in both groups decreased compared with those before chemotherapy (P<0.05),and the SAS and SDS scores in the combination group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05). The Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores in both groups increased compared with those before chemotherapy (P<0.05),and the KPS score in the combination group was higher than that in the control group (P< 0.05). The acceptance rate of subsequent chemotherapy in the combination group was 87.76% (43/49), which was higher than that in the control group ( 71.70%,38/53)( P<0.05). Conclusion:The intervention of Chinese medicine point application combined with Chinese medicine hot compress is more effective than using Chinese medicine hot compress alone in preventing adverse reactions after chemotherapy in elderly tumor patients. It can alleviate pain, improve negative mental states,and enhance the quality of life.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

石玉莹,王燕辉,张虹,潘学英.中药穴位贴敷联合中药热罨包预防老年肿瘤化疗后不良反应临床研究[J].新中医,2025,57(13):139-143

复制
相关视频

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2025-07-14
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码