耳穴压豆联合芒硝外敷对ICU 机械通气伴腹胀患者胃肠功能的影响
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R459.7

基金项目:


Effect of Auricular Point Seed-Pressing Combined with External Application of Natrii Sulfas on Gastrointestinal Function in ICU Patients with Mechanical Ventilation and Abdominal Distension
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察耳穴压豆联合芒硝外敷对重症监护室(ICU) 机械通气伴腹胀患者胃肠功能的影响。 方法:回顾性选取2023年1月—2024年12月丽水市人民医院重症医学科收治的100例ICU机械通气伴腹胀患者 为研究对象,按治疗方案差异分为联合组及对照组各50例。对照组给予常规ICU基础治疗及护理,联合组在 对照组基础上给予耳穴压豆联合芒硝外敷治疗。2组均连续治疗7天。比较2组临床疗效及恢复情况,比较2组 治疗前后中医证候积分、腹压、腹围、胃肠功能[胃蛋白酶原(PG) Ⅰ、PGⅡ、胃泌素(GAS)、胃动 素(MTL) ]、炎症及营养指标值[高迁移率族蛋白B1 (HMGB1)、单核趋化因子-4 (MCP-4)、白蛋 白(Alb)、转铁蛋白(TF)]、生活质量[世界卫生组织生存质量测评量表(WHOQOL-100) 评分] 的变化。 结果:联合组临床疗效总有效率为96.00% (48/50),对照组临床疗效总有效率为82.00% (41/50),2组比较, 差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。联合组肠蠕动恢复时间、首次排气时间及ICU停留时间均短于对照组,差异均 有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,2组中医证候积分均较治疗前下降(P<0.05),腹压、腹围均较治疗前减 小(P<0.05);联合组中医证候积分低于对照组(P<0.05),腹压、腹围均小于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后, 2组GAS、MTL、PGⅠ、PGⅡ水平均较治疗前提升(P<0.05),联合组上述4项水平均高于对照组(P<0.05)。 治疗后,2组HMGB1、MCP-4水平均较治疗前下降(P<0.05),Alb、TF水平均较治疗前上升(P<0.05);联 合组HMGB1、MCP-4水平均低于对照组(P<0.05),Alb、TF水平均高于对照组(P<0.05)。治疗后,2组 WHOQOL-100各项评分均较治疗前升高(P<0.05),联合组WHOQOL-100各项评分均高于对照组(P<0.05)。 结论:耳穴压豆联合芒硝外敷可缓解ICU机械通气伴腹胀患者的临床症状,改善营养状态,减小腹压及腹围, 促进胃肠功能恢复,提高生活质量。

    Abstract:

    Abstract:Objective:To observe the effect of auricular point seed-pressing combined with external application of natrii sulfas on gastrointestinal function in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with mechanical ventilation and abdominal distension. Methods:A retrospective study was conducted on 100 ICU patients with mechanical ventilation and abdominal distension treated at Lishui People's Hospital from January 2023 to December 2024. Patients were divided into a control group (n=50,receiving conventional ICU treatment and care) and a combination group (n=50, receiving auricular point seed-pressing combined with external application of natrii sulfas on the basis of the control grups's regimen) . Both groups were treated continuously for seven days. Clinical efficacy, recovery indicators, traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores, abdominal pressure, abdominal circumference, gastrointestinal function indicators [pepsinogen (PG)Ⅰ , PG Ⅱ , gastrin (GAS), motilin (MTL)], inflammatory and nutritional markers [high mobility group box 1 protein (HMGB1),monocyte chemotactic protein-4 (MCP-4),albumin (Alb), transferrin (TF)], and quality of life [World Health Organization Quality of Life-100 (WHOQOL-100) scores] were compared between the two groups before and after treatment. Results:The total effective rate of the combination group was 96.00% (48/50), and the total effective rate of the control group was 82.00% (41/50), the difference being significant (P<0.05). The recovery time of intestinal peristalsis, the first exhaust time, and ICU stay time in the combination group were shorter than those in the control group, differences being significant (P<0.05). After treatment, the traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores of the two groups were decreased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05),and the abdominal pressure and abdominal circumference were decreased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05). The traditional Chinese medicine syndrome score of the combination group was lower than that of the control group (P<0.05),and the abdominal pressure and abdominal circumference of the combination group were lower than those of the control group (P<0.05). After treatment,the levels of GAS,MTL,PGⅠ,and PG Ⅱ in the two groups were increased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05),and the above four levels in the combination group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment,the levels of HMGB1 and MCP-4 in the two groups decreased (P<0.05), while the levels of Alb and TF increased (P<0.05) compared with those before treatment. The levels of HMGB1 and MCP-4 in the combination group were lower than those in the control group (P<0.05), and the levels of Alb and TF in the combination group were higher than those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the WHOQOL-100 scores of the two groups were higher than those before treatment (P<0.05), and the WHOQOL-100 scores of the combination group were higher than those of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Auricular point seed-pressing combined with external application of natrii sulfas can alleviate clinical symptoms, improve nutritional status, reduce abdominal pressure and circumference, promote gastrointestinal function recovery, and enhance quality of life in ICU patients with mechanical ventilation and abdominal distension.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴燕,李柯,黄璐.耳穴压豆联合芒硝外敷对ICU 机械通气伴腹胀患者胃肠功能的影响[J].新中医,2026,58(5):121-126

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-03-12
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码