Analysis of the Current Status and Trends in Pharmacological Treatment for Acute Heart Failure Based on Bibliometrics
Author:
Affiliation:
Fund Project:
摘要
|
图/表
|
访问统计
|
参考文献
|
相似文献
|
引证文献
|
资源附件
|
文章评论
摘要:
目的:利用VOSviewer和CiteSpace等工具对近10年药物治疗急性心力衰竭的用药现状、研究热点与趋势进行文献计量学分析,为未来研究方向拓展与治疗方案创新提供借鉴。方法:检索2015年1月1日—2024年12月31日中国知网、万方、维普及Web of Science数据库发表的关于药物治疗急性心力衰竭的文献,利用VOS viewer和CiteSpace等绘制药物治疗急性心力衰竭的知识图谱,并对文献关键词、作者、发文机构等进行数据分析。结果:共纳入中文文献2 600篇,英文文献262篇,其中传统医学药物治疗文献447篇,非传统医学药物治疗文献2 415篇,发文量总体呈稳定波动趋势。发文量最多的机构分别是郑州市第七人民医院和格罗宁根大学。国内作者及团队研究数量较多,呈“分散化、碎片化”特征。以中医药为代表的传统医学药物治疗急性心力衰竭研究聚焦病因病机理论、名家效方及古籍名方、中成药、临床指标等方向,形成“辨证-用药-多维度评价”的完整研究链,非传统医学药物治疗相关研究侧重于临床试验、病理机制探寻及新型药物的研发。结论:未来需依托中医药“整体观念+辨证论治”的个体化优势,结合非传统医学“病因控制+精准靶点用药”的系统治疗逻辑,构建中西医结合的综合疗法,实现对急性心力衰竭患者的早期协同干预,兼顾疗效提升与不良反应控制。
Abstract:
Abstract:Objective:To conduct a bibliometric analysis of the current status,research hotspots,and trends in pharmacological treatment for acute heart failure (AHF) over the past decade using tools such as VOSviewer and CiteSpace, thereby providing references for expanding future research directions and innovating treatment strategies. Methods: Literature on pharmacological treatment for AHF published between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2024 was retrieved from the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang Data Knowledge Service Platform (Wanfang),China Science and Technology Journal Database (VIP),and Web of Science. Knowledge graphs of pharmacological treatment for AHF were generated using VOSviewer and CiteSpace, and data analyses were performed on keywords, authors, and publishing institutions. Results: A total of 2 600 Chinese articles and 262 English articles were included,of which 447 articles focused on traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) pharmacological treatment and 2 415 articles on non-TCM pharmacological treatment. The overall number of publications showed a stable fluctuating trend. The institutions with the highest publication output were the 7th People's Hospital of Zhengzhou and the University of Groningen. Domestic authors and research teams in China contributed the majority of publications, exhibiting a "decentralized and fragmented" characteristic. Research on TCM pharmacological treatment for AHF primarily concentrated on etiology and pathogenesis theories, proven formulas from renowned physicians, classical prescriptions from ancient texts,Chinese patent medicines,and clinical indicators,forming a complete research chain of "syndrome differentiation- herbal prescription-multidimensional evaluation." In contrast, research related to non- TCM pharmacological treatment primarily emphasized clinical trials,exploration of pathological mechanisms,and the development of novel drugs. Conclusion: Future efforts should leverage the individualized advantages of TCM, characterized by "holistic concept and syndrome differentiation-based treatment, " and integrate them with the systematic therapeutic logic of non-TCM, which emphasizes "etiological control and precise target-oriented pharmacotherapy, " to establish an integrated treatment model. This approach aims to achieve early synergistic intervention for patients with AHF,to achieve a balance between enhanced efficacy and controlled adverse effects.