穴位贴敷联合皮内针对气虚型便秘患者结肠镜前肠道准备质量的效果研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R256.35

基金项目:

广州医科大学附属中医医院1+N特支计划(2024-TZ-01,2024-TZ-02);广州市科学技术局市校院(企)联合项目(2025A03J3343);广州医科大学附属中医医院青年科技人才科研项目(2023RC03);2025—2026年度广东省科协青年科技人才培育计划(SKXRC2025136)


Study on the Effect of Acupoint Application Combined with Intradermal Needling on the Quality of Bowel Preparation Before Colonoscopy in Patients with Constipation of Qi Deficiency Type
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察穴位贴敷联合皮内针在辅助结肠镜肠道准备中对改善气虚型便秘患者肠道准备质量的疗效。方法:选取2025 年1—11 月广州医科大学附属中医医院住院部行结肠镜检查的气虚型便秘患者66 例,按照随机数字表法分为观察组和对照组各33例。观察组与对照组各脱落3例,最终完成临床试验共60例。对照组给予单纯聚乙二醇(PEG) 电解质散联合二甲硅油肠道准备方案,观察组在对照组基础上给予穴位贴敷联合皮内针治疗。比较2组肠道清洁度评分[波士顿肠道准备评价量表(BBPS)]、肠腔气泡分级评分、息肉检出率、腺瘤检出率、进镜时间、首次排便时间、肠道清洁成功时间、排便次数、不良感受、肠道准备方案再接受率。结果:治疗后,观察组BBPS量表评分中右半结肠(RC)、横结肠(TC)、左半结肠(LC) 评分及总分均高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,观察组RC、TC节段肠腔气泡分级评分及总分均低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组LC分级评分比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,2组结肠息肉、腺瘤检出率比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,观察组进镜时间、首次排便时间、肠道清洁成功时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组排便次数比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗期间,观察组恶心、腹痛、腹胀等不良感受分级均优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);2组呕吐、寐差、乏力、头晕等不良感受分级比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,观察组肠道准备方案再接受率为86.67% (26/30),对照组为63.33% (19/30),组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组穴位贴敷部位均无过敏、潮红皮疹、渗液,未出现晕针、滞针等现象。结论:穴位贴敷联合皮内针的肠道准备方案能提高气虚型便秘患者肠腔清洁度,缩短术者的进镜时间及肠道清洁成功时间,降低不良反应发生率,提高肠道准备方案再接受率。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective: To observe the efficacy of acupoint application combined with intradermal needling in improving the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy in patients with constipation of qi deficiency type. Methods: A total of 66 patients with constipation of qi deficiency type who underwent colonoscopy in the Inpatient Department of the Affiliated Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University from January to November 2025 were enrolled. They were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group using the random number table method,with 33 cases in each group. Three cases dropped out from each group,resulting in a final total of 60 patients completing the clinical trial. The control group received a bowel preparation regimen of polyethylene glycol (PEG) electrolyte powder combined with simethicone alone, while the observation group received acupoint application combined with intradermal needling on the basis of the control group's regimen. The two groups were compared in terms of bowel cleansing score [Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS)], intracolonic bubble grading score, polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, colonoscope insertion time, time to first defecation, time to successful bowel cleansing, frequency of defecation, adverse sensations, and patient acceptance of the same preparation protocol again. Results:After treatment,the scores for the right colon( RC),transverse colon( TC),left colon (LC),and total BBPS score in the observation group were superior to those in the control group (P<0.05). After treatment, the grading score of intracolonic bubble in the RC and TC segments as well as the grading score of total intracolonic bubble in the observation group were superior to those in the control group (P<0.05);while no statistically significant difference was found in the LC bubble grading score between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in polyp detection rate or adenoma detection rate (P>0.05). After treatment,the colonoscope insertion time,time to first defecation,and time to successful bowel cleansing in the observation group were shorter than those in the control group (P<0.05); while no statistically significant difference was found in the frequency of defecation between the two groups (P>0.05). During treatment,the grades of adverse reactions such as nausea,abdominal pain,and abdominal distension in the observation group were superior to those in the control group (P<0.05); while no statistically significant differences were observed in the grades of vomiting,poor sleep,fatigue,or dizziness between the two groups (P>0.05). After treatment,the patient acceptance of the same preparation protocol again was 86.67%( 26/30) in the observation group and 63.33%( 19/30) in the control group,with a statistically significant difference between the two groups (P<0.05). No allergies,flushing, rash, exudation, fainting during acupuncture, or needle sticking occurred at the acupoint application sites in the observation group. Conclusion: The bowel preparation regimen of acupoint application combined with intradermal needling can improve intestinal cleanliness in patients with constipation of qi deficiency type,reduce the colonoscope insertion time, shorten the duration to achieve successful bowel cleansing, decreased the incidence of adverse reactions, and improve patient acceptance of the same preparation protocol again.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

谢雨欣,代云凯,梁依敏,吴宇金,陈智恒,康宜兵.穴位贴敷联合皮内针对气虚型便秘患者结肠镜前肠道准备质量的效果研究[J].新中医,2026,58(16):73-81

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-08-23
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码