温通刮痧联合常规疗法治疗腰椎融合内固定术后残留症状临床研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R248

基金项目:

广东省中医药局科研项目(20231142)


Clinical Study on Warming and Unblocking Scraping Combined with Conventional Therapy for Residual Symptoms After Lumbar Fusion and Internal Fixation Surgery
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察温通刮痧联合常规疗法治疗腰椎融合内固定术后残留症状的疗效与安全性。方法:选取2023年10月—2024年5月在广州中医药大学第二附属医院骨一科治疗的72例腰椎融合内固定术后残留疼痛、活动受限等症状患者,运用随机数字表法分为对照组和治疗组各36例。对照组给予术后常规疗法治疗,包括抗感染、镇痛、体位指导与康复训练等;治疗组在此基础上联合温通刮痧治疗。术后1个月进行整体疗效判定,比较2组治疗前、治疗第3天、治疗第7天、术后1个月腰痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS) 评分、下肢疼痛VAS评分、日本骨科协会评分(JOA评分) 及下肢麻木程度。结果:治疗组临床疗效优于对照组(P<0.05)。2组4个时间点腰痛、下肢疼痛VAS评分以及JOA评分分别整体比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组腰痛、下肢疼痛VAS评分均随治疗时间延长呈下降趋势(P<0.05),JOA 评分均随治疗时间延长呈上升趋势(P<0.05)。治疗第3天,2组腰痛、下肢疼痛VAS评分均较治疗前下降(P<0.05),JOA评分均较治疗前升高(P<0.05);治疗第7天,2组下肢疼痛VAS 评分以及治疗组腰痛VAS 评分均较治疗第3天下降(P<0.05),2组JOA评分均较治疗第3天上升(P<0.05);术后1个月,2组腰痛、下肢疼痛VAS评分均较治疗第7天下降(P<0.05),JOA评分均较治疗第7天上升(P<0.05)。治疗组治疗第3天、治疗第7天及术后1个月腰痛、下肢疼痛VAS评分均低于同期对照组(P<0.05),JOA评分均高于同期对照组(P<0.05)。2组4个时间点下肢麻木程度分别整体比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。2组下肢麻木程度均随治疗时间延长呈下降趋势(P<0.05)。治疗组治疗第3 天、治疗第7 天及术后1 个月的下肢麻木程度均低于同期对照组(P<0.05)。结论:温通刮痧联合常规疗法治疗可有效缓解腰椎融合内固定术后残留症状,改善腰椎功能。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective: To observe the efficacy and safety of warming and unblocking scraping combined with conventional therapy in the treatment of residual symptoms after lumbar fusion and internal fixation surgery. Methods: A total of 72 patients with residual symptoms including pain and limited mobility after lumbar fusion and internal fixation surgery, who were treated at the First Department of Orthopedics, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, from October 2023 to May 2024, were enrolled. The patients were divided into a control group and a treatment group using a random number table method, with 36 cases in each group. The control group received routine postoperative care, including anti-infection measures, analgesia medications, postural guidance,and rehabilitation training. The treatment group received additional warming and unblocking scraping on the basis of the routine care. Overall therapeutic efficacy was assessed at 1 month postoperatively. The two groups were compared in terms of Visual Analogue Scale( VAS) scores for low back pain and lower limb pain,Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores,and grade of lower limb numbness at four time points:before treatment,on day 3 and day 7 of treatment,and at 1 month postoperatively. Results:The clinical efficacy of the treatment group was superior to that of the control group (P<0.05). The overall comparisons of VAS scores for low back pain and lower limb pain,as well as JOA scores,between the two groups at the four time points all showed statistically significant differences (P< 0.05). VAS scores for low back pain and lower limb pain in the two groups showed a decreasing trend over the treatment period (P<0.05),while JOA scores in the two groups showed an increasing trend over the same period (P<0.05) . On day 3 of treatment,VAS scores for both low back pain and lower limb pain in the two groups decreased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05), and JOA scores in the two groups increased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05) . On day 7 of treatment, VAS scores for lower limb pain in the two groups, as well as VAS scores for low back pain in the treatment group, decreased compared with those on day 3 of treatment (P<0.05), and JOA scores in the two groups increased compared with those on day 3 of treatment (P<0.05). At 1 month postoperatively, VAS scores for both low back pain and lower limb pain in the two groups decreased compared with those on day 7 of treatment (P<0.05),and JOA scores in the two groups increased compared with those on day 7 of treatment (P<0.05). At day 3, day 7 of treatment, and 1 month postoperatively, the treatment group showed significantly lower VAS scores for both low back pain and lower limb pain,as well as significantly higher JOA scores, compared with the control group at the corresponding time points (P<0.05). The overall comparisons of the grade of lower limb numbness between the two groups at the four time points all showed statistically significant differences (P< 0.05). The grade of lower limb numbness in both groups showed a decreasing trend over the treatment period( P<0.05). At day 3 and day 7 of treatment and 1 month postoperatively,the treatment group showed significantly lower grades of lower limb numbness compared to the control group at the corresponding time points( P<0.05). Conclusion:Warming and unblocking scraping combined with conventional therapy can effectively alleviate residual symptoms and improve lumbar function after lumbar fusion and internal fixation surgery.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

毛跃霞,胡天宏,陈少华,胡佩.温通刮痧联合常规疗法治疗腰椎融合内固定术后残留症状临床研究[J].新中医,2026,58(18):75-81

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-09-29
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码