浮针联合中药熏洗治疗风寒湿型肩周炎临床研究
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R274

基金项目:

广东省中医药局科研项目(20232127)


Clinical Study on Fu's Subcutaneous Needling Combined with Chinese Herbal Medicinal Fumigation and Washing in the Treatment of Periarthritis of the Shoulder of Wind-Cold- Damp Type
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:观察浮针配合中药熏洗治疗风寒湿型肩周炎的临床疗效。方法:筛选2025年2—10月于广州市番禺区中医院住院的风寒湿型肩周炎患者95例,按随机数字表法分为中药熏洗组31例、浮针组32例、浮针联合中药熏洗组(联合组)32例。所有患者均接受常规西医治疗,中药熏洗组加用中药熏洗治疗,浮针组加用浮针治疗,联合组加用中药熏洗联合浮针治疗。观察比较3组总有效率及安全性,以及治疗前后疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、日常生活能力(ADL)评分、肩关节功能活动度(ROM)评分、中医证候评分。结果:治疗后,联合组总有效率为96.88%(31/32),高于中药熏洗组70.97%(22/31)、浮针组81.25%(26/32),差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);中药熏洗组总有效率与浮针组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。治疗后,联合组愈显率为81.25% (26/32),高于中药熏洗组32.25% (10/31)(P<0.05),但与浮针组62.50% (20/32)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);浮针组愈显率亦高于中药熏洗组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,3组VAS评分较治疗前下降(P<0.05),且3组VAS评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);组间两两比较:联合组VAS 评分均低于中药熏洗组、浮针组(P<0.05),浮针组VAS 评分亦低于中药熏洗组(P<0.05)。治疗后,3组ADL评分较治疗前升高(P<0.05),且3组ADL评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);组间两两比较:联合组ADL 评分高于中药熏洗组、浮针组(P<0.05),浮针组ADL 评分亦高于中药熏洗组(P<0.05)。治疗后,3 组ROM 评分较治疗前升高(P<0.05),且3 组ROM评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);组间两两比较:联合组ROM评分高于中药熏洗组、浮针组(P<0.05),浮针组ROM评分亦高于中药熏洗组(P<0.05)。治疗后,3组中医证候评分较治疗前下降(P<0.05),且3组中医证候评分比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);组间两两比较:联合组中医证候评分均低于中药熏洗组、浮针组(P<0.05),浮针组中医证候评分亦低于中药熏洗组(P<0.05)。治疗期间,3组患者肝肾功能均无异常,均未发生相关不良反应。结论:浮针联合中药熏洗治疗可有效缓解风寒湿型肩周炎患者临床症状、改善肩关节活动度和日常生活质量,其总有效率及显效率等均优于单独浮针或中药熏洗治疗。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective: To observe the clinical efficacy of fu′s subcutaneous needling combined with Chinese herbal medicinal fumigation and washing in the treatment of periarthritis of the shoulder of wind-cold-damp type. Methods: A total of 95 patients with periarthritis of the shoulder of wind-cold-damp type hospitalized in Panyu Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from February to October 2025 were enrolled. They were randomly divided into three groups using the random number table method:Chinese herbal medicinal fumigation and washing group( group A, 31 cases), fu′s subcutaneous needling group (group B, 32 cases), and fu′s subcutaneous needling combined with Chinese herbal medicinal fumigation and washing group (combination group, 32 cases). All patients received conventional western medicine treatment. In addition, the group A received Chinese herbal medicinal fumigation and washing, the group B received fu′s subcutaneous needling, and the combination group received both Chinese herbal medicinal fumigation and washing as well as fu′s subcutaneous needling. The total effective rate, safety, as well as scores of Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, Activities of Daily Living (ADL) scale, shoulder range of motion (ROM),and traditional Chinese medicine syndrome before and after treatment were compared among the three groups. Results:After treatment,the total effective rate in the combination group was 96.88% (31/32),which was significantly higher than the rates of 70.97%( 22/31) in group A and 81.25%( 26/32) in group B( P<0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the total effective rate between group A and group B (P>0.05). After treatment, the clinical improvement rate in the combination group was 81.25% (26/32),which was significantly higher than the rate of 32.25%( 10/31) in group A( P<0.05),but showed no statistically significant difference compared with the rate of 62.50% (20/32) in group B (P>0.05). The clinical improvement rate in group B was also significantly higher than that in group A (P<0.05). After treatment,the VAS scores of the three groups decreased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05), and there was a statistically significant difference in VAS scores among the three groups (P< 0.05). Further pairwise comparisons showed that the VAS score in the combination group was lower than those in group A and group B (P<0.05), and the VAS score in the group B was also lower than that in group A (P<0.05). After treatment,the ADL scores of the three groups increased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05),and there was a statistically significant difference in ADL scores among the three groups (P<0.05). Further pairwise comparisons showed that the ADL score in the combination group was higher than those in group A and group B (P<0.05),and the ADL score in group B was also higher than that in group A (P<0.05). After treatment,the shoulder ROM scores of the three groups increased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05), and there was a statistically significant difference in shoulder ROM scores among the three groups (P<0.05). Further pairwise comparisons showed that the shoulder ROM score in the combination group was higher than those in group A and group B (P<0.05), and the shoulder ROM score in group B was also higher than that in group A (P<0.05). After treatment,the traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores of the three groups decreased compared with those before treatment (P<0.05), and there was a statistically significant difference in traditional Chinese medicine syndrome scores among the three groups (P< 0.05). Further pairwise comparisons showed that the traditional Chinese medicine syndrome score in the combination group was lower than those in group A and group B (P<0.05),and the traditional Chinese medicine syndrome score in group B was also lower than that in group A (P<0.05). During treatment,no abnormalities in liver or kidney function or any therapeutic-related adverse reactions occurred in the three groups. Conclusion: Fu′s subcutaneous needling combined with Chinese herbal medicinal fumigation and washing can effectively alleviate clinical symptoms, improve shoulder ROM and quality of daily life in patients with periarthritis of the shoulder of wind-cold-damp type. Its total effective rate and marked effective rate are superior to those of fu′s subcutaneous needling or Chinese herbal medicinal fumigation and washing alone.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

陈业兢,何树杰,刘鹏,陈凯奇.浮针联合中药熏洗治疗风寒湿型肩周炎临床研究[J].新中医,2026,58(18):87-93

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-09-29
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码