针刺疗法联合关节松动术治疗肩袖损伤疗效的Meta 分析
DOI:
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

R246.9

基金项目:

广东省中医药局科研项目(20241353);李征东莞市名中医药专家传承工作室


Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Efficacy of Acupuncture Combined with Joint Mobilization for Rotator Cuff Injury
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    目的:使用Meta分析的方法,系统评价针刺疗法联合关节松动术对肩袖损伤患者的临床疗效,为临床决策提供循证医学证据。方法:计算机系统检索中国知网(CNKI)、万方(WanFang)、维普(VIP)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、Web of Science、PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library等中英文数据库,搜集所有关于针刺疗法联合关节松动术治疗肩袖损伤的临床随机对照试验(RCTs)。检索时限均从各数据库建库起至2025年12月31日。由2名研究者独立筛选文献、提取资料并评价纳入研究的偏倚风险后,采用RStudio 2026软件对提取的结局指标数据进行Meta分析。结果:最终共纳入8项符合标准的RCTs。Meta分析结果显示:2组疼痛视觉模拟评分法(VAS) 评分[MD=-1.92,95%CI(-2.62,-1.21),P<0.001],肩关节改良评分量表(UCLA)评分[MD=6.63,95%CI (6.10,7.15),P<0.001],肩关节活动度(ROM)外展[MD=21.86,95%CI (18.34,25.37), P<0.000 1], ROM 外旋[MD=9.33, 95%CI (7.12, 11.54), P<0.0001], ROM 前屈[MD=18.75,95%CI(14.24,23.36),P<0.000 1],ROM后伸[MD=7.70,95%CI(3.76,11.64),P<0.000 1] 及临床有效率[RR=1.20,95%CI (1.08,1.32),P<0.000 1] 比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01),其中VAS评分和ROM前屈等指标存在较高异质性,结果需谨慎解释。结论:现有证据表明,相较于单纯关节松动术或联合非针刺疗法,针刺疗法联合关节松动术可能存在一定优势,可以有效地缓解肩袖损伤患者的疼痛,以改善其肩关节功能与活动度。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Objective: To systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of acupuncture combined with joint mobilization in patients with rotator cuff injury using meta-analysis,and to provide evidence-based medical evidence for clinical decision-making. Methods:CNKI,Wanfang,VIP,CBM,Web of Science,PubMed,Embase,and Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupuncture combined with joint mobilization for rotator cuff injury. The search period covered from each database's inception to December 31, 2025. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Meta-analysis of the extracted outcome indicator data was performed using RStudio 2026 software. Results:Eight RCTs met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis results showed that there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in the following outcomes (all P<0.01):Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score for pain [MD = −1.92,95% CI (−2.62,−1.21), P<0.001], the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) shoulder rating scale [MD = 6.63, 95% CI (6.10,7.15),P<0.001],shoulder range of motion (ROM) in abduction [MD=21.86,95% CI (18.34,25.37), P<0.000 1],ROM in external rotation [MD= 9.33,95% CI (7.12,11.54),P<0.000 1],ROM in forward flexion [MD=18.75, 95% CI (14.24, 23.36), P<0.000 1], ROM in extension [MD=7.70, 95% CI (3.76,11.64), P< 0.000 1],and clinical efficacy rate [RR=1.20,95% CI (1.08,1.32),P<0.000 1]. High heterogeneity was observed for VAS scores and forward flexion ROM, and the results should be interpreted with caution. Conclusion: Available evidence suggests that acupuncture combined with joint mobilization may be superior to joint mobilization alone or joint mobilization plus non-acupuncture therapy in treating rotator cuff injury. This combined therapy can effectively relieve pain and improve shoulder function and range of motion.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李家栋,肖署阳,黄祖辉,李征,张文江,周杰.针刺疗法联合关节松动术治疗肩袖损伤疗效的Meta 分析[J].新中医,2026,58(19):72-81

复制
分享
相关视频

文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2026-10-16
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码